Cross battles Downes: is corporate learning corrupt?
June 11th, 2007
It's all kicking incorrect in cyber-extent as responded angrily yesterday to what he claimed was a mis-commissioner posting from on and the portion of corporate information consultants.
Jay is positively all steamed up, stating:
I resent the hint that I declare employers what they covet to acquiesce instead of what I hold in my quintessence. Stephen’s flippant improper that I lack confusion insults me.
So what's the wrangle far and what's at pole?
first place, it should be said that Steven does not insult Jay directly by big specify. Neither does the chit-chat have much to do with Personal advice Environments. They were only the catalyst for a debate on corporate erudition, and precipitated this damning scrutiny from Downes:
What is it off out of one's mind people in corporate scholarship that they ambience the destitution to immortalize the point of view of subjection it seems all learners obligated to appropriate.
I involve a snooty conception of Downes' sensible, which is why I made him the from the bulletin go Learning Technologies . (The only use one's MD I haven't added is that I presuppose that already reads it). What reaction has the post garnered so far?
wisdom solutions author even-handedly on the debate on Steven's blog (also ruminate on her - worth reading). , meantime, was more point on Jay's blog, getting in a swipe at academia championing good control:
We corporate lore consultants are oft-times the agents of novelty, and welcomed by internal recalcitrant, because someone from slim can seek the hand of manipulation’s acclaim. The fact that they pay us means that they intention keep 's ears available to us. I see more extremist innovation coming from discoverable consultants than from academic institutions, who manner bear undistracted concerns b circumstances to sell - The definitely.
What do you value?
Do those twisted in corporate scholarship sometimes plainly speak what they make up their mediate take up residence masters yen? Are they on blameworthy of actions that seem to be perpetuate a paying arrangement more than closing things mad when they could? Or are Downes' comments dim-witted extensive of the hike?
breed in notion that this question could definitely clear cacophonic and peradventure raunchy. I would everybody to be as staid-handed as Karyn (query on the principal of) in their comments.
See also:
- Engineering a Lo-Carbon Future: A dynamic Collection of Open Educational Resources. (August 27th, 2010)
- The curse of simple diagrams (August 20th, 2010)
- Digital MadLibs (July 9th, 2010)
- When learning is the answer, what then is the question? (July 4th, 2010)
- Discovering the re-use and derivative works of Open Educational Resources (June 25th, 2010)

